Archives for posts with tag: Tripp York

The NHL All-Star game is being played in Los Angeles, California this weekend. Los Angeles is not about hockey, it’s about entertainment. It is also the 100th anniversary of the NHL so it should have really been held in Canada but hockey, like other professional sports, has become more about entertainment revenue than the sport itself [None more so than the Super Bowl next weekend where the half time show and the commercials generate almost as much coverage as the game itself]. I do celebrate the fact that all seven Canadian NHL teams have a legitimate shot at being in the playoffs at this critical juncture in the season.

I feel some ethical ambivalence surrounding professional sports and I am keenly aware of my own hypocrisy. There are the multi-million dollar contracts, the drug use and mental illness, the media analysis ad nauseam, greed and exploitation, and all the other industrial characteristics of what has indeed become an industry. And then there are the racist and militaristic team names and logos… Some would say it is merely a modern sanitized version of the brutal and bloody activities that took place in the Roman coliseum of old. At the same time I believe that play and “re-creation” is fundamental to being human. I enjoyed playing a number of competitive sports with some tenacity [track & field, baseball, football, soccer, hockey, volleyball] as a young person. Due to my aging body, my competitive spirit is now channeled into watching my children and college students play sports. I also enjoy watching sports on TV, especially NHL hockey. It’s almost a Sabbath activity: a cessation of the stress of work and the temporary suspension of life’s harsh realities.

I find watching sports a nice diversion from real life. Professional sports are not real life. Although I understand that athletes have become entertainers who have the “job” of amusing people and providing temporary relief from the humdrum of daily existence, it is not exactly an essential service. I appreciate that athletes and others in the entertainment industry are including other auxiliary activities in their work: hospital visitation, raising funds for worthy causes, speaking out on behalf of marginalized and hurting people, etc. It is good that these activities continue whether a team wins or loses. But let’s put it the whole thing in perspective: even though I will cheer mightily when a Canadian hockey team wins and sigh deeply when they lose, it really does not matter one iota to real life.

This reminds me of Tripp York’s satirical prayer included in his book, Third Way Allegiance. Here are a few excerpts [I have Canadianized it by substituting hockey teams for his baseball teams]:

Dear God, Could you please stop fixing sporting events? Seriously. Your unpredictability is killing me at the betting table. I can never figure out who you’re helping. One moment you’re hooking up a player with the Canucks and the next another player for the Flames. How am I supposed to figure out which one you love the most, or which one prayed the hardest, if you keep flip-flopping? Could you be a little less fickle with your handouts?

You are after all immutable. That means you are unchanging. It says so right here in the Bible, Malachi 3:6 “For I the Lord do not change.” Yet when it comes to sports, I am far more consistent than you. I have been a Leafs fan since 1961. Other than those few Cups in the 1960’s where you clearly graced us, do you know what misery I, along with other Leafs fans, have had to endure for decades? What do you have against Toronto? It’s no more pagan than any other city (though you have been a little more generous to the Raptors lately). Perhaps I should speak to the owner of the Maple Leafs about requiring team prayer before each game?

Anyway, do you think you could just pick a team and stay with them? No one likes a bandwagon fan. I just thought I would ask. I assumed, since you are so concerned about touchdowns, home-runs, and over-time goals, you wouldn’t mind.

Oh, and another thing (sorry to be so needy): I know you are omnipotent, but it seems you have been giving more attention to Saturday night scores than to a few other things in the world. Granted, I know extremely affluent athletes who own multiple cars and houses are crucial to you, but do you think you could, oh, I don’t know, do something about the ongoing genocide in Syria? South Sudan? Tibet? Perhaps you could send a little help to ease the tensions between your followers in Israel and Palestine? There is also this AIDS epidemic occurring in Africa. Cancer is not good. Nor are blindness, paralysis, global warming, and the near extinction of pandas…

Perhaps (I’m feeling a bit like Abraham here), perhaps you could tone down the number of tsunamis, earthquakes, and hurricanes you’ve been sending lately? While I’m asking, any chance you might convince your world leaders to stop making nuclear missiles? I know it’s a longshot, but since all governments are ordained by you, I thought it wouldn’t hurt to ask. Also, did you know that almost every four seconds someone dies of starvation? Of course you did. You’re omniscient.

Don’t get me wrong, I’m not questioning your justice; I’m sure their prayers for food and the basic necessities of life deserve to go unanswered. If I learned anything from the book of Job it is to tread quietly and not ask too many questions. But since you are overly concerned with who wears championship rings, and Jesus did, after all, say that whatever we ask for you will provide… well… could you please make sure the Leafs have a better team this year? [Is this prayer actually being answered?]

Sincerely, A distraught fan

#4 in a series of rabbit trails based on footnotes in my new book, Spirituality With Clothes On.

Is “famous Anabaptist” an oxymoron?

The note on page 93 is either hopelessly out of date or shows the age of the writer, or perhaps both. I list examples of “well known” authors and thinkers who embrace Anabaptist values and are not necessarily part of any formal Anabaptist or Mennonite institutions: Tony Campolo [80], Stanley Hauerwas [74], Brian McLaren [59], Stuart Murray [59]. First of all, note their ages, then notice that they are all men. Then go back to my blogs posted a few months ago for International Women’s Day and call me a hypocrite!

Now, “well known” is relative of course. “Well known” to whom? And, just because you are well known does not make you a better representative of Anabaptism. In fact, one could argue that it is the opposite as the nature of Anabaptism is to be simple, humble, fringe, minority, radical, etc. However, it has been a hobby of some Mennonites to associate certain more famous people than themselves as agreeing with the principles of the movement. Somehow this makes us feel less insignificant and unacceptable if there are a few “well known” people who also embrace our strange and radical values. “So and so thinks similarly so I can’t be that ridiculous.”

Perhaps a better list would have included Greg Boyd [57], Bruxy Cavey [50], Tripp York [42], Shane Claiborne [39], Julie Clawson [38], Rachel Held Evans [33], Sarah Thompson [32], executive director of CPT, not the actress. We obviously still live in a male-centric world because I found it hard to come up with “well known” female authors and thinkers who might sympathize with and/or promote Anabaptist ideas. Who is “well known” to you who could be part of this list?

I finished reading my pulp fiction for the summer, The Confession by John Grisham. It fit his formula of a suspenseful legal thriller but it had a very troubling ending with an innocent man being executed while the real murderer was making his confession. It was definitely anti-captital punishment rhetoric and it made me angry that they still do this in the USA.

What I really want to blog about is my latest read, The Devil Wears Nada by Tripp York, which also takes place in the U.S. American deep south. I must confess that I don’t think I’ve ever read a book about the devil before. I must also confess that I enjoyed reading this book so much that I actually laughed out loud a few times! Confused? Intrigued?

Tripp York grew up Nazarene, became a Mennonite about 10 years ago and is a philosophy professor in Kentucky. He is alot smarter than me and than most of the people he interviews for his research to prove the existence of and explore the nature of the devil. A warning though – he also has a gift for sarcasm which not all readers will appreciate so some might be more offended than amused as I was.

What makes the book so entertaining is the wide variety of people he interviews. The list includes people who refer to Satan more than Jesus in their ministry: a fundamentalist Nazarene pastor, a black revivalist preacher, a body-builder evangelist, the founder of an intercessory prayer organization, and a non-denominational minister. The list also includes people that those on the first list consider demonic: a Unitarian Universalist minister, a druid cleric, a pagan shamanist leader, and a few Satanists. The downside of his research is the limited geographical and cultural scope of his interviewees [How about Canadians? Africans? Asians? Don’t they have something to say about the devil?] In between these two lists of interviewees he exegetes a few key texts of Scripture: Genesis 3 [the temptation and fall story], Job [the conversation between God and Satan], Mark 5 [the sending of the evil spirits into the pigs], Luke 4:5-8 [Satan tempting Jesus], Revelation 13:7-8 [beasts, etc.].

The Devil Wears Nada is both irreverent and sincere. The book is not only entertaining but thought provoking.  I was forced to examine, not only my beliefs about the devil, but more importantly my beliefs about God, how I speak about both, and how I live. What are his conclusions? What did I think of them? That would be telling! And it would take away from your reading of the book.